0
0
mirror of https://github.com/ezyang/htmlpurifier.git synced 2024-09-19 18:55:19 +00:00
htmlpurifier/docs/dev-advanced-api.html

131 lines
4.8 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<meta name="description" content="Functional specification for HTML Purifier's advanced API." />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css" />
<title>Advanced API - HTML Purifier</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Advanced API</h1>
<div id="filing">Filed under Development</div>
<div id="index">Return to the <a href="index.html">index</a>.</div>
<div id="home"><a href="http://hp.jpsband.org/">HTML Purifier</a> End-User Documentation</div>
<p>It makes no sense to adopt a <q>one-size-fits-all</q> approach to
filtersets: therefore, users must be able to define their own sets of
<q>allowed</q> elements, as well as switch in-between doctypes of HTML.</p>
<p>Our goals are to let the user:</p>
<dl>
<dt>Select</dt>
<dd><ul>
<li>Doctype</li>
<li>Filtersets: Rich / Plain / Full ...</li>
<li>Mode: Lenient / Correctional</li>
<li>Collections (?): Safe / Unsafe</li>
<li>Modules / Tags / Attributes</li>
</ul></dd>
<dt>Customize</dt>
<dd><ul>
<li>Tags / Attributes / Attribute Types</li>
<li>Filtersets</li>
<li>Root Node</li>
</ul></dd>
<dt>Create</dt>
<dd><ul>
<li>Modules / Tags / Attributes / Attribute Types</li>
<li>Filtersets</li>
<li>Doctype</li>
</ul></dd>
</dl>
<h2>Select</h2>
<h3>Selecting a Doctype</h3>
<p>By default, users will use a doctype-based, permissive but secure
whitelist. They must define a <strong>doctype</strong>, and this serves
as the first method of determining a filterset.</p>
<p class="technical">This identifier is based
on the name the W3C has given to the document type and <em>not</em>
the DTD identifier.</p>
<p>This parameter is set via the configuration object:</p>
<pre>$config->set('HTML', 'Doctype', 'XHTML 1.0 Transitional');</pre>
<h3>Selecting a Filterset</h3>
<p>However, selecting this doctype doesn't mean much, because if we
adhered exactly to the definition we would be letting XSS and other
nasties through. HTML Purifier must, in its filterset, allow a subset
of the doctype, which we shall call a <strong>filterset</strong>.</p>
<p>By default, HTML Purifier will use the <strong>Rich</strong>
filterset, which allows as many elements as possible with untrusted
sources. Other possible filtersets could be:</p>
<dl>
<dt>Full</dt>
<dd>Allows the full span of elements in the doctype, good if you want
HTML Purifier to work as a Tidy substitute but not to strip
anything out.</dd>
<dt>Plain</dt>
<dd>Provides a minimum set of tags for semantic markup of things
like blog comments.</dd>
</dl>
<p>Extension-authors would be able to define custom filtersets for
other users to use.</p>
<p>A possible call to select a filterset would be:</p>
<pre>$config->set('HTML', 'Filterset', 'Rich');</pre>
<h3>Selecting Mode</h3>
<p>Within filtersets, there are various <strong>modes</strong> of operation.
These indicate variant behaviors that, while not strictly changing the
allowed set of elements and attributes, will definitely affect the output.
Currently, we have two modes, which may be used together:</p>
<dl>
<dt>Lenient</dt>
<dd>Deprecated elements and attributes will be transformed into
standards-compliant alternatives when explicitly disallowed. For
example, in the XHTML 1.0 Strict doctype, a <code>center</code>
tag would be turned into a <code>div</code> with the CSS property
<code>text-align:center;</code>, but in XHTML 1.0 Transitional
the tag would be preserved. This mode is on by default.</dd>
<dt>Correctional</dt>
<dd>Deprecated elements and attributes will be transformed into
standards-compliant alternatives whenever possible. Referring
back to the previous example, the <code>center</code> tag would
be transformed in both cases. However, tags without a
reasonable standards-compliant alternative will be preserved
in their form. This mode is on by default. It may have
various levels of operation.</dd>
</dl>
<h3>Selecting Modules / Tags / Attributes</h3>
<p>If this cookie cutter approach doesn't appeal to a user, they may
decide to roll their own filterset by selecting modules, tags and
attributes to allow.</p>
<p class="technical">This would make use of the same facilities
as a filterset author would use, except that it would go under an
<q>anonymous</q> filterset that would be auto-selected if any of the
relevant module/tag/attribute selection configuration directives were
non-null.</p>
<div id="version">$Id$</div>
</body></html>