mirror of
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird.git
synced 2024-11-14 23:28:43 +00:00
308 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
308 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
|
# Project roadmap
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Planned for 2023
|
||
|
|
||
|
### SNMP AgentX plugin for BIRD status export
|
||
|
Allow for easier status monitoring.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
|
||
|
BGP Monitoring Protocol (RFC 7854) is a protocol between a BGP speaker and
|
||
|
a monitoring node, which is notified about route updates and neighbor state
|
||
|
changes of the BGP speaker.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Better coverage of automatic tests
|
||
|
Functionality tests should cover more possible configurations and
|
||
|
combinations. Integration tests should run automatically between different OS
|
||
|
versions and HW architectures. Experimental support for performance regression tests.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Release 3.0-alpha1
|
||
|
Missing: MRT, merging
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Show BFD sessions details
|
||
|
CLI command showing detailed information about BFD sessions state
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Review and merge Babel extended next hop patches (RFC 9229)
|
||
|
Babel extension to allow IPv4 routes with IPv6 next hop. Patch on mailing list.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Consolidate protocol statistics
|
||
|
Consolidate protocol statistics, make them useful for SNMP plugin and implement
|
||
|
'show XX stats' command.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### TCP-AO if it appears in Linux and BSD upstream
|
||
|
Resolve whether we should or shouldn't control the kernel key management.
|
||
|
Design and implement our side for both Linux and BSD.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Conditional routes (v3)
|
||
|
Filters should be extended to allow conditional expressions based on a number of
|
||
|
matching routes in a routing table. This would allow to specify aggregate routes
|
||
|
using a static protocol and conditions like 'if there is at least 1000 routes
|
||
|
from this BGP protocol, accept this default route'. This feature comes handy
|
||
|
when a router needs to detect whether its BGP upstream is alive and working.
|
||
|
Based of number of routes received, the router can then announce or retract a
|
||
|
default route to OSPF, making multi-exit network routing simpler and more
|
||
|
effective.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Aggregating routes
|
||
|
Requested by customer: aggregating multiple routes by a common set of attributes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Implementation choice: the user specifies
|
||
|
|
||
|
EXPORT filter before aggregation AGGREGATE ON list of expressions to compare MERGE what to do with the remaining attributes
|
||
|
|
||
|
Example usage:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* aggregating information from multiple internal BGP routes into one external
|
||
|
* creating a multipath route from multiple BGP routes (currently done by MERGE PATHS)
|
||
|
* (in future) computing a minimal route set for kernel to make forwarding faster instead of writing the received full BGP set there
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PREF64 option in RA (RFC 8781)
|
||
|
Inform hosts about prefix used to synthesize NAT64 addresses. Requested in list:
|
||
|
http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2022-November/016401.html
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Logging via UDP
|
||
|
Got a patch, probably never merged. May be useful.
|
||
|
http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2022-January/015893.html
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute (RFC 9012)
|
||
|
Packets sent to BGP next hop may be encapsulated using various tunnel
|
||
|
technologies. Useful for L3VPN.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP AS Cones and ASPA support
|
||
|
Extend the RPKI protocol with AS Cones and ASPA loading. Implement AS Cones
|
||
|
and ASPA validation routines. There may be some pending patches from QRator.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### DHCPv6 relay agent
|
||
|
DHCPv6 relay agents (RFC 8415, RFC 8987) forward DHCPv6 messages between clients and
|
||
|
servers. They also ensure that prefixes delegated by DHCPv6-PD are routable,
|
||
|
i.e. they should generate routes for these prefixes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Nexthop attributes and ECMP filtering
|
||
|
Currently we have route attributes, but with ECMP routes it is necessary to
|
||
|
store per-nexthop data (like weight or encapsulation). We also do not have
|
||
|
proper way to manipulate with multiple nexthops from filters. Attributes should
|
||
|
be extended to allow per-nexthop ones and filters should be extended to allow
|
||
|
access multiple nexthops and their attributes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Performance accounting
|
||
|
Extended internal statistics about time spent in different modules of BIRD. If
|
||
|
the route server admin checks why it takes 15 minutes to converge, this should
|
||
|
give some basic info about performance. [MM: Internally needed by 3.0, already in progress]
|
||
|
|
||
|
### MPLS support
|
||
|
Finalize and merge improved MPLS infrastructure (including MPLS label allocator
|
||
|
and supporting code), improve its reconfiguration support and support for
|
||
|
segment routing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP Segment Routing Extension (RFC 8669)
|
||
|
Receive and announce Segment Identifiers (SIDs) for BGP next hops.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Backlog for following years
|
||
|
|
||
|
*The order of these items is not significant.*
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Flowspec attribute filtering
|
||
|
Flowspec routes have many parameters, but these are not accessible from filters.
|
||
|
Filters should be extended to access all these attributes, but first it is
|
||
|
necessary to cleanup attribute handling in filters.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP Optimal Route Reflection (RFC 9107)
|
||
|
Implement BGP best route selection on route reflectors to adhere to POV of
|
||
|
client, not RR. Also requested by somebody, don't remember who and when.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### OSPF Traffic engineering extensions (RFC 3630)
|
||
|
Requested in list. May include lots of other RFC's as we have neglected this
|
||
|
feature for a long time.
|
||
|
http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2022-January/015911.html
|
||
|
|
||
|
### IPv6 preference in documentation (?)
|
||
|
Address world's reluctance of legacy IPv4 deprecation by updating the
|
||
|
documentation in such a way that IPv6 is preferred and first seen.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP local prefix leak prevention (?)
|
||
|
Reject local prefixes on eBGP sessions by default to prevent leaks to public Internet.
|
||
|
Unless explicitly enabled by config, of course.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Re-bogonization of 240/4 legacy range (?)
|
||
|
We shouldn't believe that every operator does the
|
||
|
filtering right and they could simply rely on pre-2.0.10 behavior which
|
||
|
filtered this out by default.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### IPv4 multicast
|
||
|
Basic infrastructure for IPv4 multicast routing, including nettypes for
|
||
|
multicast routes and multicast requests, multicast kernel protocol and IGMPv2
|
||
|
protocol.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PIM-BIDIR
|
||
|
Bidirectional PIM (RFC 5015) is a multicast routing protocol, variant of PIM-SM.
|
||
|
It uses bidirectional shared trees rooted in Rendezvous Point (RP) to connect
|
||
|
sources and receivers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is an old branch containing this. We should have merged this years ago.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Improved VRF support
|
||
|
BIRD has working VRF support, but it needs improvements. VRF entities should be
|
||
|
first-class objects with explicit configuration, with a set of properties and
|
||
|
default values (like default routing tables, or router ID) for associated
|
||
|
protocols. Default kernel table ID should be autodetected. There should be
|
||
|
better handling of VRF route leaking - when a route is propagated between VRFs,
|
||
|
its nexthop should reflects that. Setup of VRFs in OS is out of scope.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Linux kernel nexthop abstraction
|
||
|
Netlink allows setting nexthops as objects and using them in routes. It should
|
||
|
be much faster than conventional route update.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Protocol attributes for filtering
|
||
|
Filters can access route attributes, but sometimes it could be useful to access
|
||
|
attributes of associated protocol (like neighbor-as or neighbor-ip for BGP
|
||
|
protocol). But it would require to have internal object model (below) first,
|
||
|
as we do not want to implement it independently for each protocol attribute.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Mutable static routes
|
||
|
Extension to the static protocol that would allow to add/remove/change static
|
||
|
routes from CLI.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Multipipe
|
||
|
Pipe-like protocol: When a route is exported to this protocol, it runs its
|
||
|
filter extended with capability to announce any number of new routes to any
|
||
|
table from one filter run. Its primary purpose is to allow user-specified
|
||
|
route aggregation and other non-linear operations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP minimum route advertisement interval (MRAI)
|
||
|
BGP specifies minimum interval between route advertisements for the same
|
||
|
network. This is not implemented in BIRD. It should be implemented for 3.0 to
|
||
|
avoid unnecessary re-routing spikes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### OSPF unnumbered interfaces
|
||
|
The OSPFv2 protocol allows interfaces that do not have proper IP range but have
|
||
|
peer IP addresses (like PtP links). It should be extended to also allow true
|
||
|
unnumbered interfaces with no addresses (by using an IP address from some
|
||
|
loopback device). This would require to have stricter separation between IP
|
||
|
addresses and interfaces in OSPFv2.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### OSPF Segment Routing Extension (RFC 8665)
|
||
|
MPLS label distribution using segment routing and simple OSPF extension.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### MPLS Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
|
||
|
Label Distribution Protocol (RFC 5036) is a protocol for establishing
|
||
|
label-switched paths and distributing of MPLS labels between MPLS routers.
|
||
|
These paths and labels are based on existing unlabeled routing information.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### IPv6 multicast
|
||
|
Basic infrastructure for IPv6 multicast routing, including nettypes for
|
||
|
multicast routes and multicast requests, multicast kernel protocol and MLDv1
|
||
|
protocol. Most of these (with the exception of MLDv1) is just a variant of
|
||
|
IPv4 multicast.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### IGMP/MLD multicast proxy
|
||
|
A simple IGMP/MLD multicast proxy, which sends IGMP/MLD requests on a configured
|
||
|
uplink interface based on received requests on downlink interfaces, and updates
|
||
|
associated multicast routes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Source-specific multicast (SSM)
|
||
|
Infrastructure for multicasts should be extended to handle source-specific
|
||
|
multicasts. Extend multicast nettypes to include source addresses, handle them
|
||
|
in multicast kernel protocols and implement IGMPv3/MLDv2 protocols.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PIM-SSM
|
||
|
PIM-SSM is a source-specific multicast routing protocol, a subset of PIM-SM
|
||
|
protocol (RFC 7761). It is restricted to source-specific multicasts, which
|
||
|
eliminates many problematic parts of PIM-SM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Seamless BFD
|
||
|
New version of BFD negotiation defined in RFC 7880-7886 enables faster
|
||
|
continuity tests by dissemination discriminators by the governing protocols.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### OSPF Graceful Link Shutdown
|
||
|
To enable seamless maintenance of single links, OSPF can advertise such a link
|
||
|
getting down in advance, allowing to re-route. Defined in RFC 8379.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Long-term
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Internal object model
|
||
|
We need to define explicit internal object model, where existing objects
|
||
|
(protocols, channels, tables, routes, interfaces ...) and their properties are
|
||
|
described in a way that allows introspection sufficient for implementing
|
||
|
features (control protocol, CLI, filter access, perhaps reconfiguration) in a
|
||
|
generic manner.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Generic configuration model
|
||
|
Configuration options are implicitly defined by the configuration parsing code.
|
||
|
We need to define explicit configuration model independent of the parsing code
|
||
|
and generic parsing code using that model. This will allow uniform validation of
|
||
|
configuration properties, generic access to configuration from control protocol
|
||
|
and possibly independent configuration backends (like one for Netconf).
|
||
|
|
||
|
### New control protocol
|
||
|
BIRD should have a well-documented machine readable protocol. Requirements for
|
||
|
such protocol are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Generic machine readable abstract-tree representation (like CBOR)
|
||
|
* Both request/reply and subscribe/notify access patterns
|
||
|
* Access objects and properties using internal object model
|
||
|
* In-band introspection based on internal object model
|
||
|
|
||
|
From Maria's notes:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* CBOR-based protocol for both control and route exports
|
||
|
* Python3 library with example implementation of CLI
|
||
|
* (maybe) Ansible modules
|
||
|
* RFC 9164: CBOR tags for IP addresses and prefices
|
||
|
* RFC 9254: YANG-CBOR mapping
|
||
|
* RFC 9277: Stable storage of CBOR (files)
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Perhaps
|
||
|
|
||
|
### IS-IS
|
||
|
IS-IS routing protocol is a nice-to-have alternative to OSPF.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGPsec
|
||
|
BGPsec (RFC 8205) is a new path security extension to BGP.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### PIM-SM
|
||
|
PIM-SM (RFC 7761) is a prevailing multicast routing protocol, but more
|
||
|
complicated than planned PIM-BIDIR and PIM-SSM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Netconf
|
||
|
Network Configuration Protocol (RFC 6241) is a XML/JSON protocol for
|
||
|
configuration management of network devices. It would benefit from generic
|
||
|
configuration model (above).
|
||
|
|
||
|
### NetConf overlay
|
||
|
Machine-friendly config file editor daemon (standalone) with standard NetConf
|
||
|
interface on one side and BIRD config file + reconfiguration requests on the
|
||
|
other side. Python3 seems to be better choice than C for this kind of work.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Backend for 802.11r
|
||
|
Let's assume a bunch of boxes, all having some public wifi APs and some (secure) uplinks.
|
||
|
Design and implement an automatic backbone protocol to allow for simple almost-zeroconf
|
||
|
setup of e.g. a conference room or train / bus public wifi or even a local home network,
|
||
|
all with hostapd seamlessly transferring clients between APs via 802.11r.
|
||
|
Possible collab with Turris.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BFD Multipoint Connectivity
|
||
|
Checking whether multiple "receivers" can communicate with a single "sender".
|
||
|
Possibly useful after merging PIM-BIDIR and implementing other PIMs. RFC 8562-8563.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### BGP Link State extension
|
||
|
BGP-LS allows to transport information about network topology across BGP links.
|
||
|
This should help e.g. to run traffic-engineering between more confederated ASs.
|
||
|
Also needed to implement Seamless BFD on BGP: RFC 9247
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Locator/ID Separation Protocol
|
||
|
LISP intends to break up addressing to Routing Locators and Endpoint
|
||
|
Identifiers. This may help multihoming networks in future. RFC 9299-9306.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Backend for IPv6 Multihoming without BGP
|
||
|
Implement and configure BIRD in such a way that local nodes are seamlessly
|
||
|
connected to the Internet via multiple upstreams, using Network Prefix
|
||
|
Translation and other techniques. Possible collab with Turris.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Minor
|
||
|
|
||
|
* RFC 8510: OSPF LLS Extension for Local Interface ID Advertisement
|
||
|
* RFC 8538: BGP Graceful Restart Hard Reset
|
||
|
* RFC 8326: BGP Graceful Session Shutdown Community auto-apply
|
||
|
* RFC 8962: Become part of the IETF Protocol Police
|
||
|
* RFC 9072: Extended Optional Parameters Length for BGP OPEN Message
|
||
|
* RFC 9339: OSPF Reverse Metric
|